1. As expected, Google is playing its full advantage in the battle for Smartphone supremacy. By leveraging its advertising capabilities (built through acquisition of AdMob, earlier acquisition of Doubleclick Mobile and it’s own AdWords Mobile Ads) it can offer mobile operators a kick-back for selling Android phones.

    Can the others follow? Well, they all have some income to share from their App stores, but not in the region of what Google can share. Nokia acquired Enpocket in 2007, but not much has been heard of that since. Microsoft has Adcenter as well as the Microsoft/Yahoo! search alliance. Apple and Blackberry will have to rely on their Apps and media incomes if they want to follow.

    Will they need to follow? Apple probably not - they rely more on consumer pull than operator push. But Nokia, Blackberry and Microsoft really need the operators unless they start making phones that are more attractive than Apple’s. That is a long shot.

    This all points to a surge in Android phones being pushed by operators, and a reliance from Apple on the iPhone’s cool factor. Not good news for BlackBerry, Nokia and Microsoft!

     
  2. 15:27 12th Mar 2010

    notes: 1

    reblogged from: interestingnesss

    tags: appleipadfunny

    image: download

    Coming up.. iMat.

(via loreez)
    Coming up.. iMat.

    (via loreez)

     
  3. 16:03 4th Feb 2010

    notes: 34

    reblogged from: marco

    tags: appleipad

    Economically, there doesn’t seem to be a huge incentive to spend a lot on an iPad edition.
     
  4. 16:06 2nd Feb 2010

    notes: 14

    tags: apple

    What is the point of multi-touch?

    I keep hearing about multi-touch as if it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. It started with the great and famous talk at TED from Jeff Han, and has been “acquired” by Apple ever since. They keep heralding it’s differentiation as a multi-touch vendor, and many have followed in their footsteps: the Palm pre and pixel feature it, and so does the Motorola Droid. Microsoft has surface, and there is even an Asus Eee with it. Every time it is talked up as if it is the most important feature, but every time it is done with the same examples.

    So far the only useful multi-touch gestures have been pinch-to-zoom and rotate.Pinch-to-zoom is nice, especially as a demo, but it is not very usable. You can only pinch a very short distance and there is no momentum - so you have to keep pinching if you want to zoom right in. You could combine hold a left finger and zooming with a right finger, but I would be surprised if anybody does that regularly (do try it in iPhone photo: it does not work).

    Rotate with two fingers is also a great demo feature, but on a small screen it is a pain because rotating means covering most of the picture with your fingers so you cannot see what you’re doing. And anyway, rotating the actual device is much easier. Rotate is therefore not even supported on the iPhone (not in photo nor in map application).

    So is there anything else? Not much. Video games sometimes require multi-touch, but usually that can also be easily handled with single touch. Other actions like making two-fingered drag different than one-fingered drag are implemented on MacBooks, but all are ways to scroll, zoom and rotate in different ways. This is similar to all those control, alt and shift combinations; in programs that I have used for more than 10 years I still have to try and see which one it was that did what I want to do.

    Is multi-touch a technology push? A solution looking for a problem? What is the point of multi-touch?